- Fighting Complacency Reminder: Nothing We Do is Routine, NOTHING!!!
- Street Level Red Teaming: The Cop Killer
- Street Level Red Teaming: Assessing The Situation From the Adversarial Point of View
- Take A.I.M. and Prepare To Win Dynamic Encounters
- Don't Charge Police for Mistakes
- What is a Threat?
- Benefits of Conditioning Our Decision Making...The Boyd Cycle
- Superior Situational Awareness and Decision Making...Attributes And Skills of Full Spectrum Officers
- Earning "The Right to Lead" With Character and Courage
- JUSTIFIED: Are You Serious? The Balancing Act of Persuasion, and Reasonable Force
- Adaptive Leader Methodology: An Alternative for Better Outcomes
- When Do We Teach the Basics?
- Positive Leadership: Invest in People Building a Culture of Innovation
- Harnessing The Street Cops Wisdom: Taking Whole of Conflict...And Effective Full Spectrum Responses
- Beyond Active Response: An Operational Concept for Police Counterterrorism Response
- The Badge: Much More Than a Piece of Medal
- Wellbeing Check to Knife Attack: Anticipation-The Double Edged Sword and its Affect on Winning and Losing, Up Close and Personal
- Fast Transients, Manipulating the Tempo of Conflict: Disrupting and Confusing Our Adversary via Full Spectrum Response
- Leadership By Wandering Around!
- Defeat into Victory: Battling a Tough Climate with Faith, Perseverance and Lessons Learned
- Evolving Threats and the Fourth Generation Warfare Problem Here at Home
- We were ready, they weren't...40 Years after Newhall, Are We Applying Lessons Learned?
- When Violence Prevention Fails, Planning Must Enhance Strategy
- After Action Review: Is It a Tool Used to Learn and Become More Effective or a Tool Used to Punish?
- Maintaining Mental Calmness and Not Losing Our Cool
- Evolution of Strategy and Tactics to Ongoing Deadly Action "Active Shootings" and Operational Art
- Interaction, Insight and Imagination, and Initiative...The Building Blocks of Police Operational Art
- Coffee and Conversation: Is "Officer Friendly" a Factor to Consider in Engagements with Our Adversary?
- Coffee and Conversation: "Sharpening Our Orientation" and Reducing Officers Killed in the Line of Duty
- Coffee and Conversation: Police Make Mistakes But Seldom Admit Them! What's Reasonable?
- Coffee and Conversation: The Tactical Decision Maker: The Devil's Definitely in the Details
- Coffee and Conversation: "Self Awareness" The Forgotten Attribute of Decision Making
- Coffee and Conversation: Issues that Affect Law Enforcement and Security: Walking our Talk to Officer Safety
- Coffee and Conversation: Issues that Affect Law Enforcement and Security: The Inevitable Failure of Suburbia?
- Law Enforcement and the Utility of Force...Why Cops Can't Shoot Like the Lone Ranger?
- Tactics: Applying Methods to Madness
Success requires both speed and quickness by Gary Gagliardi
Submitted by Fred on Thu, 05/28/2009 - 6:59pm.
“The backbone of surprise is fusing speed with secrecy.” Karl von Clausewitz
“In skating over thin ice our safety is our speed.” Ralph Waldo Emerson
“I've always found that the speed of the boss is the speed of the team.” Lee Iacocca
“Intelligence is quickness in seeing things as they are.” George Santayana
Let us start with some clear definitions differentiating between speed and quickness.
- Speed is the ability to cover distance (as defined in S-BOK 4.4) in a straight line rapidly.
- Quickness is the ability to change directions rapidly (S-BOK 5.3).
Speed in covering distance means both the physical and mental ability to change positions. Distance measures the space between positions. Distance exists both in physically space (S-BOX 4.4.1), which affects transportation, and in psychological space (S-BOK 4.4.2), which affects learning. Good communication is affected by both forms of distance. To be communicate rapidly, messages must close both the physical gap of space and the psychological gap of knowledge as rapidly as possible.
As the quotes from von Clausewitz and Emerson above note, speed has a number of advantages other than the obvious ones of getting ahead and staying ahead of competitors. Since all opportunities are limited in time (S-BOK 5.3.2), speed make it possible for us to close the gap between our current position and an opportunistic position. It also allows us to get through difficult ground, in its various forms, (S-BOK 6.4) more safely.
Quickness, on the other hand, is a matter of clearly seeing a fast-changing situation and rapidly making a decision to change direction. The cycle time of the adaptive loop (S-BOK 1.8.3) where external event leads to appropriate reaction is determined by quickness.
Though speed and quickness are not opposing skills, too much attention to speed as opposed to quickness is dangerous. As a passenger, I have often noticed that when people are running late and get lost, they often speed up, even though they don't know whether or not they are going in the right direction. Speeding up when we are going in the wrong direction creates more damage not less. As the saying goes:
"Direction is more important than speed. We are so busy looking at our speedometers that we forget the milestone." Anonymous
As with all strategic characteristics, both speed and quickness are evaluated only in comparison. Competitors are only relatively faster or slower when compared with other competitors operating within their environment.
Interestingly enough, the critical difference between speed and quickness is most commonly recognized in the world of sports. Coaches have long realized that a given player can be slower in terms of straight line speed than another player, but still be many times quicker because they can see their situations and react to them faster. It is the ability to quickly see and react to opportunities that makes a great competitor in any field.
- Fred's blog
- Login or register to post comments
